Comments on: Why I’d look good in women’s clothing

By: hot coffee girl

hot coffee girl — Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:00:19 +0000

I feel like there’s a Freud joke in here somewhere.

By: Phil

Phil — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:57:03 +0000

Jane: That’s indeed me. It was done via Photoshop. Very simple. Just get picture, trace the contour, and you’re done.

By: jane

jane — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:55:22 +0000

Is that really your silhouette? If so, how do you take a picture like that? (I’m only asking because I usually believe something like this w/o question, only later to find out it wasn’t serious)

My son has the same problem, he’s about 5′4 and 160. It’s not that you guys are fat, just compact. There should be a compact store for compact men. Funny because most women write that they’d prefer women’s clothes be sold like mens…simple length and waist. A size 10 pants in Women’s is different for every single brand. But a 28 waist is a 28 waist! See what I mean?

Anyways, I hope you’ll take a picture of you in the suit when you get it.

By: Phil

Phil — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 06:26:41 +0000

Emma, Jon: I really did myself in on this one, eh?

Nishant: That sort of defeats the purpose of being fashionable. I could always wear a brown potato sack. Those fit me well.

By: Nishant

Nishant — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 05:07:36 +0000

Bypass the whole issue.

By: Jonathan Weatherhead

Jonathan Weatherhead — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:32:00 +0000

And pray that a mostly opaque circle follows you around.

By: Emma

Emma — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:25:12 +0000

Honey, there’s an easy solution.

Just walk around naked.

By: Jonathan Weatherhead

Jonathan Weatherhead — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:16:22 +0000

195 lbs at 5′7?!?!?! Wow…I’m only about 145 lbs at 5′7.

But I have more or less the same problem, except probably not quite as bad as you.

Women’s clothing would certainly work but I would rather not appear on CNN right after Michael Jackson (and possibly right before Mr. Phil)