A story of a distressed aerophobic, an irresistible mathematician, and a lonely seven hour flight.
This submission to Plus Magazine’s 2008 New Writer’s Award is perhaps the first ever literary work combining the volatile genres of mathematical fiction with the guilty pleasures of bloke-lit.
March 25, 2008
This is a newest (and hopefully the last) version.
Reduced mathage, extra cheese, and more nakedness (or not).
Enjoy.
Let’s face it. Some things in life are certainties. This is one of them:

Or so I thought.

“I don’t wanna die.”
See, when your plane is plummeting towards the Atlantic and dozens of oxygen masks are simultaneously popped from their compartments, that’s precisely what you’re supposed to be thinking.
That’s what most sane passengers on board Flight 888 were thinking, anyways, but not me; personally, I was content to stare at the gorgeous woman sitting by my side and wonder — amidst all the screaming — whether, she’d be the type to favour wit and humour over a Calvin-Klein physique.
Mind you, this was just the setup (it turned out to be a false alarm, anyways — “Due to horrendous weather conditions,” said the pilot), but I still wanted to give you an idea of the truly epic life-or-death scope of the story to come.
The real story, however, begins with her.
Even in the limited illumination of the cabin, her hair shone a rich, copper red. This framed not only a perfect curving face, but also two of the bluest eyes I’d ever seen. But this wasn’t all. The earlier theatrics had scared her and despite clear skies and smooth sailing, I could tell she was still on edge. But this was perfect, you see, because it gave me a chance to swoop in and sooth her poor, tortured soul (that’s how it’s supposed to work, anyways).
“Just a little turbulence,” I offered helpfully, “Nothing to be scared of — uh…” I trailed off, motioning expectantly towards her.
“Rhea.”
“Right. Rhea. It’s Jeff, by the way. There’s nothing to be scared of, Rhea,” I assured her again.
She was silent for a moment; then leaning over me, pointed a slender finger out the window. “Nothing?” she said, raising an eyebrow, “Yeah, nothing is what’s stopping us from plummeting, oh I dunno, twenty-thousand feet to the ground in a blazing tomb of shattering metal and death, right? …Jeff?”
So it was going to be harder than I thought.

Ten minutes had passed since my disastrous attempt to heroically intervene, and by now, she was already nervously fingering her way through a Cosmo magazine.
I needed to do something — something drastic — or I was going lose her to another one of those ghastly how-does-your-love-life-stack-up quizzes.
“You’re wrong,” I blurted out, loudly.
She turned and looked at me, bemused.
“About what?”
“What you said earlier. About how nothing is holding us up.”
I ran my fingers through my hair and backtracked. “Look, flying wasn’t invented overnight, right? Da Vinci, Cayley, Lanchester, Joukowski, …” I rattled off a few more impressive-sounding names, “Thousands of the greatest minds conspiring over hundreds of years with the sole purpose of reaching one of man’s greatest dreams…”
“So?”
“So…today — today, aerodynamics, all this –,” I gestured out the window, “All this — is grounded in solid, rigorous mathematics. It’s not nothingness that’s holding us up. It’s math.”
“Math,” she repeated disinterestedly, “I’m not very good at math.”
“You don’t have to be,” I replied softly.
She picked up the Cosmo magazine from her lap and froze for what seemed like ages. Then, seeming to have made a decision, she placed it in the pouch before her and leaned back in her seat, sighing.
“Okay,” she said, nodding, “Let’s talk.”
By now, we’d both finished our creations: three crisp paper airplanes assembled with the enthused precision only a 10-year-old could muster.

She threw hers and laughed as it flopped straight to the ground. Mine careened suicidally into a bulkhead and the stewardess, having witnessed all our shenanigans, scowled in our direction.
As I held up the last plane, I explained. “There are four aerodynamic forces we need to talk about: thrust, drag, lift, and gravity.” I said, gesturing in each of the four directions.

“As air flows over the plane, pressure is exerted on the surface of the plane. If there’s more pressure on the bottom than the top, lift is produced, and the plane stays aloft so long as the force is greater than gravity.”
“But this,” she said, waving at our surroundings, “is not made of paper.”
“Ah ha! Obtaining lift is easy — heck, even a barn door raised at an angle produces lift. The second problem is drag, and so flight is actually the problem of maximizing lift, while minimizing drag.”
“But how?” I asked excitedly, “What kind of aerofoil design do we need, Rhea?”
“Beats me,” she said, amused by my enthusiasm, “But I bet you’ll tell me all about it over dinner.”

It was like a date, really.
But with only two meal choices and really crappy wine.
“So…” Rhea said, prodding her chicken suspiciously, “When the Wright Brothers managed the first ever flight in nineteen-hundred-whatever, they didn’t actually know how the math worked?”
With a fork, I poked my own in-flight meal timidly. Half-expecting the chicken to wake up and start clucking hysterically, I wisely opted for the fruit cup instead.

“The Wright Brothers were at the forefront of experimental aerodynamics,” I corrected, “Using their own wind tunnel tests, they produced different aerofoils until they found one that worked. Most importantly, it had to be curved (or cambered) so air flows faster over the top; this reduces the pressure on the top and so produces more lift.”
“But surprisingly, there were almost no meaningful aerodynamic theories at the time. We had the right equations — but nobody knew what to do with them.”
“But this changed?”
I pushed my meal back with a grimace. “Oh, sure. Theoretical aerodynamics was rampant only a handful of years later. But, uh…I dunno,” I said, teasing her, “You sure you’re ready for this stuff?”
I leaned back and pretended to peer at her dubiously.
“I mean, it’s pretty wild.”
She just rolled her eyes and went back to eating.
The crew had turned off the lights and so most passengers were dozing quietly. Not us, though. We insisted on whispering softly, and with the lone reading light providing the only illumination, it had the eerie effect of making it seem like we were the only two passengers on board Flight 888.
“The three governing equations of fluid motion are known as the Navier Stokes Equations,” I explained while scribbling on napkins, “And together, they simply express three fundamental laws of nature in a mathematical form.”
“This one here,” I said pointing to the first equation, “Says that the total amount of fluid — or, in our case, air particles – has to remain constant. This is just conservation of mass. Stuff can’t disappear.”
“The second one here is Newton’s Second Law: Mass times acceleration, is equal to the total applied force. That’s just conservation of momentum.”
“And the last one here is conservation of energy — the total energy in the system must remain constant.”
She looked disdainfully at the row of napkins strewn before her and pointed a single, perfectly manicured finger at one of them. “What can we do with that?” she asked.

“It’s tough,” I conceded, “These equations are too hard to solve directly. And even for the two-dimensional problem (flow around a cross section of the aerofoil), it’s still too complicated because of the geometry.”
“So what we do is we consider a simpler geometry, say, the airflow around a flat plate; we solve the governing equations for this problem, then we construct a mathematical map that brings us back to the original, more difficult geometry.”
“It’s tough, I know. But the point is, the math is all there. It’s not a mystery anymore, like it was for da Vinci and the Wright Brothers.
And that — believe it or not — was the last time we’d talk about math.

She was relaxed now, and her head was gently propped against a pillow resting on my shoulder. But whether or not this Zen-like state of relaxation was because of newfound understanding (as opposed to sheer mental boredom)…well, I’ll let you decide.
In any case, it worked, and hell, she hadn’t touched that damn Cosmo since we both started talking.
“Are you asleep?” I asked.
She took her time answering. “Not yet”.
“Sooooo…”, I said, stretching out the vowel and grinning sheepishly, “Tell me, what do you do?”
At that suggestion, she whipped her head off the pillow and gave me such a look of pure, seething outrage that…well, I tell ya’, it would have immediately sent lesser mortals fleeing.
“Oooooh, I get it,” she squealed, “Good looking stranger corners you on an airplane for a three hour balls-to-wall math lecture, and then asks what you do. Typical,” she sniffed.
“Wha–?”, I said, feigning mock hurt, “But I got you dinner and everything.”
She gave me a mischievous grin, punched her pillow, and put her head back.
“Admit it Jeff,” she said, “You’ve been using me.”
I pushed the button on my armrest turning off the overhead lights and plunging the two of us into blissful darkness.
“Babe,” I said, “You’ve no idea.”
epilogue

Nishant says,
You really are emo Phil. But I still enjoyed it.
Emma says,
I have to disagree with the above comment and say I didn’t find the story emo at all! It’s really well done, Phil. I loved it, and I think your other readers are going to love it, too!
Jonathan Weatherhead says,
Hell yeah!
Jenny says,
Brilliant, Phil! I’m looking forward to hearing more stories about Jeffrey.
By the way, was this story inspired in any way by happenings in the life of our very own blogster?
Dave says,
Woah! That was pretty good Phil. I think it was well written, grammatically sound and flowed very nicely.
I thought you were going to have a conclusion with the girl/guy hooking up! Since they didn’t, I don’t get why there was a sense of romantic tension between the two.
Optimistic spin on math, i think people would have a good read overall from this story.
Sat says,
nice post Phil, it was a good read.
Dan says,
Fun for the whole family. Hopefully that magazine will select it.
Emma says,
“I thought you were going to have a conclusion with the girl/guy hooking up! Since they didn’t, I don’t get why there was a sense of romantic tension between the two.”
Personally, I thought the ending was perfect. I’m rather glad it didn’t end with two new inductees to the Mile High Club!
Then again, it might appeal more to the general public…
Silent Bob of the OCF says,
You’ve got a gift for dialog and writing as well as mathematics Phil. My fear is that not many people will be interested in the two combined. I like your story, but the layman and those who are not interested in the mathematical portion of it will probably have their mind start to wander and get bored or start skimming when getting into all the technobabble.
Jane D. says,
That was, without a doubt, the sexiest math article written in the history of math articles.
Which, by the way, doesn’t say much.
But an accomplishment nonetheless. I see on the contest site it says you only had 1500 words to use. Given the fact it needed to be about math, it’s surprising how much human-interaction you managed to cram into that.
Stace says,
Pretty good, Mr Phil!
I like how, even though the Maths is there, it can be followed by almost anyone if they are interested.
Rhea wouldn’t be the only person who left a note for Jeff based on that conversation…
Emma says,
I have to admit liking this one much better than the previous version.
It’s funny; Jeff’s cute, but Rhea’s a bit distant (I’m guessing you did that on purpose…?). There’s a really good balance between math and fiction, and it doesn’t seem like you’re preaching to the readers. The epilogue divides me. I like the fact it gives closure. But on the other hand, it’s also not really needed. The story could have ended fine without it.
It’s really apparent that your usual (real life) sarcasm and self-deprecative mood filters into Jeff in this version. Which I always enjoy.
Dave says,
I liked this one better than the previous one as well; ending gave Rhea more character than the original.
BTW: The note Rhea leaves in the epilogue says “how can two people can look out…”.
Middleman says,
Loved this post. You might enjoy this one on a similar subject:
http://caughtinthemiddleman.wordpress.com/2007/03/09/planes-trains-automobiles-part-2/
Beax says,
Hi! I was checking out bloggerschoiceawards.com when I saw yours nominated. I got interested with your blog design and happened to read this post.
I’m not someone who likes math but I proceeded to reading it and found the story really nice, especially the ending.