
Not a lot of people understand the difference between pure and applied maths. Well, not a lot of people care, but bear with me.
Here’s an analogy: Suppose that you toss a ball into the air. It goes up and down in the shape of a parabola. So you head to the physicist and you ask him to model this for you. Using what he knows about gravity, velocity, and acceleration, he writes down a formula — it’s a quadratic equation. Let’s say that he even solves this equation, by a computer, by hand, whatever.
Now the applied mathematician sees all this going on and says, well gee, that’s an interesting equation. I wonder what happens to the ‘2′ in the equation if I change it to a ‘3′. Of course, by turning that ‘2′ into a ‘3′, the mathematician might be removing the physical ‘correctedness’ of the model, but who cares. After all, it’s the maths which entertain him. Not the physics.
Now this abstraction process continues. The mathematicians start turning those 3s to 4s. Then 4s to 5s. Then suddenly, the goal is to solve that problem for any choice of number ‘N’. Of course, now that the equation has been mucked about so much, nobody has any clue what it all means. It’s just interesting mathematics, you see.
For the Pure mathematician, the physical motivation of their work has been lost through decades of abstraction. Mathematicians just keep on abstracting and abstracting, unifying these concepts while ditching those, changing variables and making everything airtight. Most of these people don’t know what’s the physical applications of what they do. They’re like children stuck in a grown-up’s world. Everyone’s busy worrying about salaries and jobs and careers, and they just want to have some fun.
Here’s a clip from the not-so-well-known 1980s movie, It’s My Turn. According to IMDB, the movie is about “a successful but stressed mathematics professor who goes to her father’s wedding and falls in love. But then — duh duh duuuh — she must choose between him and her current boyfriend, between Chicago and New York, and between research and administration.
Dear lord. Somehow, I doubt any of you are going to be flying off to your nearest Blockbuster to rent this. But do watch this clip.
By the way, this isn’t a parody of real life. I’ve actually taught uber-obnoxious lanky mathematicians with bad hair and intellectual issues just like that guy. And the teacher’s parting shot? Classic.
But the point I want to make is the following: Do you think anybody in that class knows what the fuck that stuff is good for? Of course not.
Half of them have no idea what’s going on. A quarter are seriously considering dropping this course — now that they’ve realised the professor probably isn’t going to put out. And the other quarter? For the other quarter, it’s all a game. A game of symbols and relations and unity and structure.
These words she mentions: kernels, cokernel, groups, cohomology, … these words did have some physical meaning at some point. Perhaps. But certainly not anymore. Now, they’re just definitions. You might as well replace all the words with ‘bippity-bonk’, ’scooby-doo’, and ‘chuppity-chink’. It’d sound a lot funnier and it’d probably mean the same — at least to three quarters of the class.
Is this something you can spend your life doing?
